RIMI - Repository of the Institute for Medical Research
Institute for Medical Research
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIMI
  • Institut za medicinska istraživanja
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   RIMI
  • Institut za medicinska istraživanja
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Novel Single-Stroke Kayak Test: Can It Discriminate Between 200-m and Longer-Distance (500-and 1000-m ) Specialists in Canoe Sprint?

Authorized Users Only
2021
Authors
Petrović, Miloš R.
Garcia-Ramos, Amador
Janićijević, Danica
Perez-Castilla, Alejandro
Knežević, Olivera
Mirkov, Dragan M.
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Purpose: To test whether the force-velocity (F-V) relationship obtained during a specific single-stroke kayak test (SSKT) and during nonspecific traditional resistance-training exercises (bench press and prone bench pull) could discriminate between 200-m specialists and longer-distance (500- and 1000-m) specialists in canoe sprint. Methods: A total of 21 experienced male kayakers (seven 200-m specialists and 14 longer-distance specialists) participated in this study. After a familiarization session, kayakers came to the laboratory on 2 occasions separated by 48 to 96 hours. In a randomized order, kayakers performed the SSKT in one session and the bench press and bench pull tests in another session. Force and velocity outputs were recorded against 5 loads in each exercise to determine the F-V relationship and related parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, F-V slope, and maximum power). Results: The individual F-V relationships were highly linear for the SSKT (r = .990 [.908, .998]...), bench press (r = .993 [.974, .999]), and prone bench pull (r = .998 [.992, 1.000]). The F-V relationship parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, and maximum power) were significantly higher for 200-m specialists compared with longer-distance specialists (all Ps lt = .047) with large effect sizes ( gt = 0.94) revealing important practical differences. However, no significant differences were observed between 200-m specialists and longer-distance specialists in the F-V slope (P gt = .477). Conclusions: The F-V relationship assessed during both specific (SSKT) and nonspecific upper-body tasks (bench press and bench pull) may distinguish between kayakers specialized in different distances.

Keywords:
muscle mechanical capacities / sensitivity / specificity / strength testing
Source:
International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance, 2021, 16, 2, 208-215
Publisher:
  • Human Kinetics Publ Inc, Champaign
Funding / projects:
  • Muscular and Neural Factors of Human Locomotion and their Adaptation (RS-175037)
  • Noninvasive modulation of cortical excitability and plasticity - Noninvasive neuromodulation of the CNS in the study of physiological mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment (RS-175012)

DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0925

ISSN: 1555-0265

PubMed: 32942255

WoS: 000613977900009

Scopus: 2-s2.0-85096220796
[ Google Scholar ]
3
2
URI
http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1081
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Institut za medicinska istraživanja
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Petrović, Miloš R.
AU  - Garcia-Ramos, Amador
AU  - Janićijević, Danica
AU  - Perez-Castilla, Alejandro
AU  - Knežević, Olivera
AU  - Mirkov, Dragan M.
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1081
AB  - Purpose: To test whether the force-velocity (F-V) relationship obtained during a specific single-stroke kayak test (SSKT) and during nonspecific traditional resistance-training exercises (bench press and prone bench pull) could discriminate between 200-m specialists and longer-distance (500- and 1000-m) specialists in canoe sprint. Methods: A total of 21 experienced male kayakers (seven 200-m specialists and 14 longer-distance specialists) participated in this study. After a familiarization session, kayakers came to the laboratory on 2 occasions separated by 48 to 96 hours. In a randomized order, kayakers performed the SSKT in one session and the bench press and bench pull tests in another session. Force and velocity outputs were recorded against 5 loads in each exercise to determine the F-V relationship and related parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, F-V slope, and maximum power). Results: The individual F-V relationships were highly linear for the SSKT (r = .990 [.908, .998]), bench press (r = .993 [.974, .999]), and prone bench pull (r = .998 [.992, 1.000]). The F-V relationship parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, and maximum power) were significantly higher for 200-m specialists compared with longer-distance specialists (all Ps  lt = .047) with large effect sizes ( gt = 0.94) revealing important practical differences. However, no significant differences were observed between 200-m specialists and longer-distance specialists in the F-V slope (P  gt = .477). Conclusions: The F-V relationship assessed during both specific (SSKT) and nonspecific upper-body tasks (bench press and bench pull) may distinguish between kayakers specialized in different distances.
PB  - Human Kinetics Publ Inc, Champaign
T2  - International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance
T1  - The Novel Single-Stroke Kayak Test: Can It Discriminate Between 200-m and Longer-Distance (500-and 1000-m ) Specialists in Canoe Sprint?
EP  - 215
IS  - 2
SP  - 208
VL  - 16
DO  - 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0925
UR  - conv_4971
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Petrović, Miloš R. and Garcia-Ramos, Amador and Janićijević, Danica and Perez-Castilla, Alejandro and Knežević, Olivera and Mirkov, Dragan M.",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Purpose: To test whether the force-velocity (F-V) relationship obtained during a specific single-stroke kayak test (SSKT) and during nonspecific traditional resistance-training exercises (bench press and prone bench pull) could discriminate between 200-m specialists and longer-distance (500- and 1000-m) specialists in canoe sprint. Methods: A total of 21 experienced male kayakers (seven 200-m specialists and 14 longer-distance specialists) participated in this study. After a familiarization session, kayakers came to the laboratory on 2 occasions separated by 48 to 96 hours. In a randomized order, kayakers performed the SSKT in one session and the bench press and bench pull tests in another session. Force and velocity outputs were recorded against 5 loads in each exercise to determine the F-V relationship and related parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, F-V slope, and maximum power). Results: The individual F-V relationships were highly linear for the SSKT (r = .990 [.908, .998]), bench press (r = .993 [.974, .999]), and prone bench pull (r = .998 [.992, 1.000]). The F-V relationship parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, and maximum power) were significantly higher for 200-m specialists compared with longer-distance specialists (all Ps  lt = .047) with large effect sizes ( gt = 0.94) revealing important practical differences. However, no significant differences were observed between 200-m specialists and longer-distance specialists in the F-V slope (P  gt = .477). Conclusions: The F-V relationship assessed during both specific (SSKT) and nonspecific upper-body tasks (bench press and bench pull) may distinguish between kayakers specialized in different distances.",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publ Inc, Champaign",
journal = "International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance",
title = "The Novel Single-Stroke Kayak Test: Can It Discriminate Between 200-m and Longer-Distance (500-and 1000-m ) Specialists in Canoe Sprint?",
pages = "215-208",
number = "2",
volume = "16",
doi = "10.1123/ijspp.2019-0925",
url = "conv_4971"
}
Petrović, M. R., Garcia-Ramos, A., Janićijević, D., Perez-Castilla, A., Knežević, O.,& Mirkov, D. M.. (2021). The Novel Single-Stroke Kayak Test: Can It Discriminate Between 200-m and Longer-Distance (500-and 1000-m ) Specialists in Canoe Sprint?. in International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance
Human Kinetics Publ Inc, Champaign., 16(2), 208-215.
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0925
conv_4971
Petrović MR, Garcia-Ramos A, Janićijević D, Perez-Castilla A, Knežević O, Mirkov DM. The Novel Single-Stroke Kayak Test: Can It Discriminate Between 200-m and Longer-Distance (500-and 1000-m ) Specialists in Canoe Sprint?. in International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance. 2021;16(2):208-215.
doi:10.1123/ijspp.2019-0925
conv_4971 .
Petrović, Miloš R., Garcia-Ramos, Amador, Janićijević, Danica, Perez-Castilla, Alejandro, Knežević, Olivera, Mirkov, Dragan M., "The Novel Single-Stroke Kayak Test: Can It Discriminate Between 200-m and Longer-Distance (500-and 1000-m ) Specialists in Canoe Sprint?" in International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance, 16, no. 2 (2021):208-215,
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0925 .,
conv_4971 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIMI | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIMI | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB