Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
f20e8983-1253-4ee7-b572-ea4473ccd144
  • Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach

van der Giessen, Joke; Deksne, Gunita; Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles; Troell, Karin; Gomes, Jacinto; Sotiraki, Smaragda; Rozycki, Miroslaw; Kucsera, Istvan; Đurković-Đaković, Olgica; Robertson, Lucy J.

(2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - van der Giessen, Joke
AU  - Deksne, Gunita
AU  - Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles
AU  - Troell, Karin
AU  - Gomes, Jacinto
AU  - Sotiraki, Smaragda
AU  - Rozycki, Miroslaw
AU  - Kucsera, Istvan
AU  - Đurković-Đaković, Olgica
AU  - Robertson, Lucy J.
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1088
AB  - In 2012, WHO/FAO ranked 24 foodborne parasites (FBP) using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to provide risk assessors with a basis for prioritising control of highly ranked FBP on the global level. One conclusion was that ranking may differ substantially per region. In Europe, the same methodology was used to rank FBP of relevance for Europe. Of the 24 FBP, the top-five prioritised FBP were identified for Europe as Echinococcus multilocularis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spiralis, E. granulosus, and Cryptosporidium spp., all of which are zoonotic. The objective of the present study was to provide an overview of surveillance and reporting systems in Europe for these top five prioritised FBP in the human and animal populations, to identify gaps, and give recommendations for improvement. Information on the surveillance systems was collected from 35 European countries and analysed according to the five different regions. For most FBP, human surveillance is passive in most countries and regions in Europe and notification differs between countries and regions. Adequate surveillance programmes for these FBP are lacking, except for T. spiralis, which is notifiable in 34 countries with active surveillance in susceptible animals under EU directive. Although human and animal surveillance data are available for the five prioritised FBP, we identified a lack of consistency in surveillance and reporting requirements between national experts and European bodies. Recommendations for improved surveillance systems are discussed.
T2  - Parasite Epidemiology & Control
T1  - Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00205
ER  - 
@article{
author = "van der Giessen, Joke and Deksne, Gunita and Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles and Troell, Karin and Gomes, Jacinto and Sotiraki, Smaragda and Rozycki, Miroslaw and Kucsera, Istvan and Đurković-Đaković, Olgica and Robertson, Lucy J.",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In 2012, WHO/FAO ranked 24 foodborne parasites (FBP) using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to provide risk assessors with a basis for prioritising control of highly ranked FBP on the global level. One conclusion was that ranking may differ substantially per region. In Europe, the same methodology was used to rank FBP of relevance for Europe. Of the 24 FBP, the top-five prioritised FBP were identified for Europe as Echinococcus multilocularis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spiralis, E. granulosus, and Cryptosporidium spp., all of which are zoonotic. The objective of the present study was to provide an overview of surveillance and reporting systems in Europe for these top five prioritised FBP in the human and animal populations, to identify gaps, and give recommendations for improvement. Information on the surveillance systems was collected from 35 European countries and analysed according to the five different regions. For most FBP, human surveillance is passive in most countries and regions in Europe and notification differs between countries and regions. Adequate surveillance programmes for these FBP are lacking, except for T. spiralis, which is notifiable in 34 countries with active surveillance in susceptible animals under EU directive. Although human and animal surveillance data are available for the five prioritised FBP, we identified a lack of consistency in surveillance and reporting requirements between national experts and European bodies. Recommendations for improved surveillance systems are discussed.",
journal = "Parasite Epidemiology & Control",
title = "Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00205"
}
van der Giessen, J., Deksne, G., Gómez-Morales, M. A., Troell, K., Gomes, J., Sotiraki, S., Rozycki, M., Kucsera, I., Đurković-Đaković, O.,& Robertson, L. J.. (2021). Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach. in Parasite Epidemiology & Control, 13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00205
van der Giessen J, Deksne G, Gómez-Morales MA, Troell K, Gomes J, Sotiraki S, Rozycki M, Kucsera I, Đurković-Đaković O, Robertson LJ. Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach. in Parasite Epidemiology & Control. 2021;13.
doi:10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00205 .
van der Giessen, Joke, Deksne, Gunita, Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles, Troell, Karin, Gomes, Jacinto, Sotiraki, Smaragda, Rozycki, Miroslaw, Kucsera, Istvan, Đurković-Đaković, Olgica, Robertson, Lucy J., "Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach" in Parasite Epidemiology & Control, 13 (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00205 . .
59
30
27