Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorRofes, Adria
dc.creatorZakarias, Lilla
dc.creatorCeder, Klaudia
dc.creatorLind, Marianne
dc.creatorJohansson, Monica Blom
dc.creatorde Aguiar, Vania
dc.creatorBjekić, Jovana
dc.creatorFyndanis, Valantis
dc.creatorGavarro, Anna
dc.creatorSimonsen, Hanne Gram
dc.creatorHernandez Sacristan, Carlos
dc.creatorKambanaros, Maria
dc.creatorKuvač-Kraljević, Jelena
dc.creatorMartinez-Ferreiro, Silvia
dc.creatorMavis, Ilknur
dc.creatorMendez Orellana, Carolina
dc.creatorSor, Ingrid
dc.creatorLukacs, Agnes
dc.creatorTuncer, Muge
dc.creatorVuksanović, Jasmina
dc.creatorMunarriz Ibarrola, Amaia
dc.creatorPourquie, Marie
dc.creatorVarlokosta, Spyridoula
dc.creatorHoward, David
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T13:00:21Z
dc.date.available2021-04-20T13:00:21Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1554-351X
dc.identifier.urihttp://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/902
dc.description.abstractImageability is a psycholinguistic variable that indicates how well a word gives rise to a mental image or sensory experience. Imageability ratings are used extensively in psycholinguistic, neuropsychological, and aphasiological studies. However, little formal knowledge exists about whether and how these ratings are associated between and within languages. Fifteen imageability databases were cross-correlated using nonparametric statistics. Some of these corresponded to unpublished data collected within a European research network-the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (COST IS1208). All but four of the correlations were significant. The average strength of the correlations (rho = .68) and the variance explained (R (2) = 46%) were moderate. This implies that factors other than imageability may explain 54% of the results. Imageability ratings often correlate across languages. Different possibly interacting factors may explain the moderate strength and variance explained in the correlations: (1) linguistic and cultural factors; (2) intrinsic differences between the databases; (3) range effects; (4) small numbers of words in each database, equivalent words, and participants; and (5) mean age of the participants. The results suggest that imageability ratings may be used cross-linguistically. However, further understanding of the factors explaining the variance in the correlations will be needed before research and practical recommendations can be made.en
dc.publisherSpringer, New York
dc.relationCOST action [IS1208]
dc.relationGlobal Brain Health Institute
dc.relationBasque team
dc.relationBasque Government [IT983-16-GIC 15/129]
dc.relationMINECO/FEDER [FFI2015-68589-C2-1-P]
dc.relationResearch Council of Norway [223265]
dc.relationCroatian Science Foundation
dc.relationProject "Adult Language Processing" (ALP) [HRZZ-2421-UIP-11-2013]
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/175012/RS//
dc.relationAnadolu University, Scientific Research Project (BAP)[1509S632]
dc.relationPROGRAM (University of Copenhagen Excellence Programme for Interdisciplinary Research)
dc.relationMinisterio de Economia y Competitividad Spanish Government [FFI2015-68589-C2-1-P, FFI2014-61888-EXP]
dc.relationProject [FFI2014-56968-C4-1-P]
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceBehavior Research Methods
dc.subjectImageabilityen
dc.subjectLinguisticsen
dc.subjectCross-linguisticen
dc.subjectCorrelationsen
dc.titleImageability ratings across languagesen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage1197
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other50(3): 1187-1197
dc.citation.rankaM21
dc.citation.spage1187
dc.citation.volume50
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13428-017-0936-0
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/703/899.pdf
dc.identifier.pmid28707216
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85023742110
dc.identifier.wos000434639400023
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу