An initial evaluation of newly proposed biomarker of zinc status in humans - linoleic acid: dihomo-y-linolenic acid (LA:DGLA) ratio

2016
Authors
Knez, Marija Lj.
Stangoulis, James C. R.

Zec, Manja M.

Debeljak-Martačić, Jasmina

Pavlović, Zoran
Gurinović, Mirjana A.

Glibetić, Marija D.

Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Zinc is an essential micronutrient for humans with important physiological functions. A sensitive and specific biomarker for assessing Zn status is still needed. Objective: The major aim of this study was to examine if the changes in the content of plasma phospholipid LA, DGLA and LA: DGLA ratio can be used to efficiently predict the dietary Zn intake and plasma Zn status of humans. Methods: The study was performed on healthy human volunteers, 25-55 years of age. The dietary Zn intake was assessed using 24 h recall questionnaires. Plasma phospholipid fatty acid analysis was done by gas chromatography, and plasma analysis of minerals by atomic absorption spectrometry. Biochemical, anthropometrical and hematological parameters were assessed. Results: No significant relationship was found between the dietary and plasma zinc status (r = 0.07; p = 0.6). There was a statistically significant correlation between DGLA and plasma Zn (r = 0.39, p = 0.00). No relationship was observed... between the linoleic acid and plasma Zn, while there was a significant negative correlation between LA: DGLA ratio and plasma Zn status (r = 0.35, p = 0.01). Similarly, there were statistically significant difference in DGLA status (p = 0.004) and LA: DGLA ratio (p = 0.042) between the Zn formed groups. Conclusions: This study is an initial step in evaluating LA: DGLA ratio as a biomarker of Zn status in humans. The results are encouraging as they show that concentration of DGLA is decreased and LA: DGLA ratio increased in people with lower dietary Zn intake. However, additional studies are needed to fully examine the sensitivity of this biomarker.
Keywords:
Zinc / Fatty acid composition / LA: DGLA / Healthy population / Dietary Zn intake / Plasma Zn status / Zn biomarkerSource:
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2016, 15, 85-92Publisher:
- Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam
Funding / projects:
- Biological effects, nutritional intake and status of folate and polysaturate fatty acid (PUFA): improvement of nutrition in Serbia (RS-41030)
- Beneficial effects of dietary bioactive peptides and polyphenols on cardiovascular health in humans (EU-312090)
- Australian Postgraduate AwardAustralian Government
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.06.013
ISSN: 2405-4577
PubMed: 28531790
WoS: 000446651700015
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84989223343
Collections
Institution/Community
Institut za medicinska istraživanjaTY - JOUR AU - Knez, Marija Lj. AU - Stangoulis, James C. R. AU - Zec, Manja M. AU - Debeljak-Martačić, Jasmina AU - Pavlović, Zoran AU - Gurinović, Mirjana A. AU - Glibetić, Marija D. PY - 2016 UR - http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/706 AB - Background: Zinc is an essential micronutrient for humans with important physiological functions. A sensitive and specific biomarker for assessing Zn status is still needed. Objective: The major aim of this study was to examine if the changes in the content of plasma phospholipid LA, DGLA and LA: DGLA ratio can be used to efficiently predict the dietary Zn intake and plasma Zn status of humans. Methods: The study was performed on healthy human volunteers, 25-55 years of age. The dietary Zn intake was assessed using 24 h recall questionnaires. Plasma phospholipid fatty acid analysis was done by gas chromatography, and plasma analysis of minerals by atomic absorption spectrometry. Biochemical, anthropometrical and hematological parameters were assessed. Results: No significant relationship was found between the dietary and plasma zinc status (r = 0.07; p = 0.6). There was a statistically significant correlation between DGLA and plasma Zn (r = 0.39, p = 0.00). No relationship was observed between the linoleic acid and plasma Zn, while there was a significant negative correlation between LA: DGLA ratio and plasma Zn status (r = 0.35, p = 0.01). Similarly, there were statistically significant difference in DGLA status (p = 0.004) and LA: DGLA ratio (p = 0.042) between the Zn formed groups. Conclusions: This study is an initial step in evaluating LA: DGLA ratio as a biomarker of Zn status in humans. The results are encouraging as they show that concentration of DGLA is decreased and LA: DGLA ratio increased in people with lower dietary Zn intake. However, additional studies are needed to fully examine the sensitivity of this biomarker. PB - Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam T2 - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN T1 - An initial evaluation of newly proposed biomarker of zinc status in humans - linoleic acid: dihomo-y-linolenic acid (LA:DGLA) ratio EP - 92 SP - 85 VL - 15 DO - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.06.013 UR - conv_4410 ER -
@article{ author = "Knez, Marija Lj. and Stangoulis, James C. R. and Zec, Manja M. and Debeljak-Martačić, Jasmina and Pavlović, Zoran and Gurinović, Mirjana A. and Glibetić, Marija D.", year = "2016", abstract = "Background: Zinc is an essential micronutrient for humans with important physiological functions. A sensitive and specific biomarker for assessing Zn status is still needed. Objective: The major aim of this study was to examine if the changes in the content of plasma phospholipid LA, DGLA and LA: DGLA ratio can be used to efficiently predict the dietary Zn intake and plasma Zn status of humans. Methods: The study was performed on healthy human volunteers, 25-55 years of age. The dietary Zn intake was assessed using 24 h recall questionnaires. Plasma phospholipid fatty acid analysis was done by gas chromatography, and plasma analysis of minerals by atomic absorption spectrometry. Biochemical, anthropometrical and hematological parameters were assessed. Results: No significant relationship was found between the dietary and plasma zinc status (r = 0.07; p = 0.6). There was a statistically significant correlation between DGLA and plasma Zn (r = 0.39, p = 0.00). No relationship was observed between the linoleic acid and plasma Zn, while there was a significant negative correlation between LA: DGLA ratio and plasma Zn status (r = 0.35, p = 0.01). Similarly, there were statistically significant difference in DGLA status (p = 0.004) and LA: DGLA ratio (p = 0.042) between the Zn formed groups. Conclusions: This study is an initial step in evaluating LA: DGLA ratio as a biomarker of Zn status in humans. The results are encouraging as they show that concentration of DGLA is decreased and LA: DGLA ratio increased in people with lower dietary Zn intake. However, additional studies are needed to fully examine the sensitivity of this biomarker.", publisher = "Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam", journal = "Clinical Nutrition ESPEN", title = "An initial evaluation of newly proposed biomarker of zinc status in humans - linoleic acid: dihomo-y-linolenic acid (LA:DGLA) ratio", pages = "92-85", volume = "15", doi = "10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.06.013", url = "conv_4410" }
Knez, M. Lj., Stangoulis, J. C. R., Zec, M. M., Debeljak-Martačić, J., Pavlović, Z., Gurinović, M. A.,& Glibetić, M. D.. (2016). An initial evaluation of newly proposed biomarker of zinc status in humans - linoleic acid: dihomo-y-linolenic acid (LA:DGLA) ratio. in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam., 15, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.06.013 conv_4410
Knez ML, Stangoulis JCR, Zec MM, Debeljak-Martačić J, Pavlović Z, Gurinović MA, Glibetić MD. An initial evaluation of newly proposed biomarker of zinc status in humans - linoleic acid: dihomo-y-linolenic acid (LA:DGLA) ratio. in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 2016;15:85-92. doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.06.013 conv_4410 .
Knez, Marija Lj., Stangoulis, James C. R., Zec, Manja M., Debeljak-Martačić, Jasmina, Pavlović, Zoran, Gurinović, Mirjana A., Glibetić, Marija D., "An initial evaluation of newly proposed biomarker of zinc status in humans - linoleic acid: dihomo-y-linolenic acid (LA:DGLA) ratio" in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 15 (2016):85-92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.06.013 ., conv_4410 .