RIMI - Repository of the Institute for Medical Research
Institute for Medical Research
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIMI
  • Institut za medicinska istraživanja
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   RIMI
  • Institut za medicinska istraživanja
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation has no placebo effect on motor learning

Authorized Users Only
2013
Authors
Jelić, Milan
Stevanović, Vuk B.
Milanović, Slađan
Ljubisavljević, Miloš
Filipović, Saša
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Objective: Motor learning is the core cognitive function in neurorehabilitation and in various other skill-training activities (e. g. sport, music). Therefore, there is an increasing interest in the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methods for its enhancement. However, although usually assumed, a potential placebo effect of TMS methods on motor learning has never been systematically investigated. Methods: Improvement of performance on the Purdue Pegboard Task over three test-blocks (T0, T1, and T2), separated by gt 20 min, was used to evaluate motor learning. In Experiment-1, two groups of 10 participants each were compared: one group immediately before T1 received a sham intermittent theta burst stimulation procedure (P-iTBS group), while another did not have any intervention at all (control - CON group). In Experiment-2, a third group of participants (six subjects) who received sham high-frequency repetitive TMS procedure before T1 (P-rTMS group) was compared with P-iT...BS group. Results: All three groups showed significant learning over time, but without any difference between them, either in Experiment-1 between P-iTBS and CON, or in Experiment-2 between P-rTMS and P-iTBS. Conclusion: The results suggest lack of any placebo effect of TMS on motor learning. Significance: The results may help in designing further TMS-motor learning studies and in interpreting their results.

Keywords:
Placebo / Motor learning / Transcranial magnetic stimulation / Purdue pegboard / Brain plasticity / Neurorehabilitation
Source:
Clinical Neurophysiology, 2013, 124, 8, 1646-1651
Publisher:
  • Elsevier Ireland Ltd, Clare
Funding / projects:
  • Noninvasive modulation of cortical excitability and plasticity - Noninvasive neuromodulation of the CNS in the study of physiological mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment (RS-175012)

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.024

ISSN: 1388-2457

PubMed: 23562657

WoS: 000323165000022

Scopus: 2-s2.0-84880156287
[ Google Scholar ]
7
7
URI
http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/498
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Institut za medicinska istraživanja
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jelić, Milan
AU  - Stevanović, Vuk B.
AU  - Milanović, Slađan
AU  - Ljubisavljević, Miloš
AU  - Filipović, Saša
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/498
AB  - Objective: Motor learning is the core cognitive function in neurorehabilitation and in various other skill-training activities (e. g. sport, music). Therefore, there is an increasing interest in the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methods for its enhancement. However, although usually assumed, a potential placebo effect of TMS methods on motor learning has never been systematically investigated. Methods: Improvement of performance on the Purdue Pegboard Task over three test-blocks (T0, T1, and T2), separated by  gt 20 min, was used to evaluate motor learning. In Experiment-1, two groups of 10 participants each were compared: one group immediately before T1 received a sham intermittent theta burst stimulation procedure (P-iTBS group), while another did not have any intervention at all (control - CON group). In Experiment-2, a third group of participants (six subjects) who received sham high-frequency repetitive TMS procedure before T1 (P-rTMS group) was compared with P-iTBS group. Results: All three groups showed significant learning over time, but without any difference between them, either in Experiment-1 between P-iTBS and CON, or in Experiment-2 between P-rTMS and P-iTBS. Conclusion: The results suggest lack of any placebo effect of TMS on motor learning. Significance: The results may help in designing further TMS-motor learning studies and in interpreting their results.
PB  - Elsevier Ireland Ltd, Clare
T2  - Clinical Neurophysiology
T1  - Transcranial magnetic stimulation has no placebo effect on motor learning
EP  - 1651
IS  - 8
SP  - 1646
VL  - 124
DO  - 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.024
UR  - conv_3032
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jelić, Milan and Stevanović, Vuk B. and Milanović, Slađan and Ljubisavljević, Miloš and Filipović, Saša",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Objective: Motor learning is the core cognitive function in neurorehabilitation and in various other skill-training activities (e. g. sport, music). Therefore, there is an increasing interest in the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methods for its enhancement. However, although usually assumed, a potential placebo effect of TMS methods on motor learning has never been systematically investigated. Methods: Improvement of performance on the Purdue Pegboard Task over three test-blocks (T0, T1, and T2), separated by  gt 20 min, was used to evaluate motor learning. In Experiment-1, two groups of 10 participants each were compared: one group immediately before T1 received a sham intermittent theta burst stimulation procedure (P-iTBS group), while another did not have any intervention at all (control - CON group). In Experiment-2, a third group of participants (six subjects) who received sham high-frequency repetitive TMS procedure before T1 (P-rTMS group) was compared with P-iTBS group. Results: All three groups showed significant learning over time, but without any difference between them, either in Experiment-1 between P-iTBS and CON, or in Experiment-2 between P-rTMS and P-iTBS. Conclusion: The results suggest lack of any placebo effect of TMS on motor learning. Significance: The results may help in designing further TMS-motor learning studies and in interpreting their results.",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd, Clare",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
title = "Transcranial magnetic stimulation has no placebo effect on motor learning",
pages = "1651-1646",
number = "8",
volume = "124",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.024",
url = "conv_3032"
}
Jelić, M., Stevanović, V. B., Milanović, S., Ljubisavljević, M.,& Filipović, S.. (2013). Transcranial magnetic stimulation has no placebo effect on motor learning. in Clinical Neurophysiology
Elsevier Ireland Ltd, Clare., 124(8), 1646-1651.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.024
conv_3032
Jelić M, Stevanović VB, Milanović S, Ljubisavljević M, Filipović S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation has no placebo effect on motor learning. in Clinical Neurophysiology. 2013;124(8):1646-1651.
doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.024
conv_3032 .
Jelić, Milan, Stevanović, Vuk B., Milanović, Slađan, Ljubisavljević, Miloš, Filipović, Saša, "Transcranial magnetic stimulation has no placebo effect on motor learning" in Clinical Neurophysiology, 124, no. 8 (2013):1646-1651,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.024 .,
conv_3032 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIMI | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIMI | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB