RIMI - Repository of the Institute for Medical Research
Institute for Medical Research
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIMI
  • Institut za medicinska istraživanja
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   RIMI
  • Institut za medicinska istraživanja
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effects of online parietal transcranial electric stimulation on associative memory: a direct comparison between tDCS, theta tACS, and theta-oscillatory tDCS

Thumbnail
2022
Effects_of_online_parietal_transcranial_electric_pub_2022.pdf (1.362Mb)
Authors
Živanović, Marko
Bjekić, Jovana
Konstantinović, Uroš
Filipović, Saša
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Associative memory (AM) is the ability to remember and retrieve multiple items bound together. Previous studies aiming to modulate AM by various transcranial electric stimulation (tES) techniques were inconclusive, although overall suggestive that tES could be a tool for AM enhancement. However, evidence from a direct comparison between different tES techniques is lacking. Here, in a sham-controlled cross-over experiment, we comparatively assessed the effects of three types of tES—anodal tDCS, theta-band transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and theta-oscillatory tDCS (otDCS), delivered over the left posterior parietal cortex, during a short-term digit-color AM task with cued-recall. The effects were tested in 40 healthy young participants while both oscillatory tES were delivered at a previously determined individual theta frequency (4–8 Hz). All three active stimulations facilitated the overall AM performance, and no differences could be detected between them on direct... comparison. However, unlike tDCS, the effects of which appeared to stem mainly from the facilitation of low-memory demand trials, both theta-modulated tACS and otDCS primarily promoted AM in high memory demand trials. Comparable yet differential effects of tDCS, theta tACS, and otDCS could be attributed to differences in their presumed modes of action.

Keywords:
Biological techniques / Cognitive neuroscience / Electrophysiology / Learning and memory / Neuroscience
Source:
Scientific Reports, 2022, 12, 1, 14091-
Publisher:
  • Springer Nature
Funding / projects:
  • MEMORYST - From Brain Waves to Memory Boost: Memory Enhancement By Personalized Frequency-Modulated Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (RS-6058808)
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200163 (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy) (RS-200163)
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200015 (University of Belgrade, Institute for Medical Research) (RS-200015)

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18376-5

ISSN: 2045-2322

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1254
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Institut za medicinska istraživanja
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Bjekić, Jovana
AU  - Konstantinović, Uroš
AU  - Filipović, Saša
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1254
AB  - Associative memory (AM) is the ability to remember and retrieve multiple items bound together. Previous studies aiming to modulate AM by various transcranial electric stimulation (tES) techniques were inconclusive, although overall suggestive that tES could be a tool for AM enhancement. However, evidence from a direct comparison between different tES techniques is lacking. Here, in a sham-controlled cross-over experiment, we comparatively assessed the effects of three types of tES—anodal tDCS, theta-band transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and theta-oscillatory tDCS (otDCS), delivered over the left posterior parietal cortex, during a short-term digit-color AM task with cued-recall. The effects were tested in 40 healthy young participants while both oscillatory tES were delivered at a previously determined individual theta frequency (4–8 Hz). All three active stimulations facilitated the overall AM performance, and no differences could be detected between them on direct comparison. However, unlike tDCS, the effects of which appeared to stem mainly from the facilitation of low-memory demand trials, both theta-modulated tACS and otDCS primarily promoted AM in high memory demand trials. Comparable yet differential effects of tDCS, theta tACS, and otDCS could be attributed to differences in their presumed modes of action.
PB  - Springer Nature
T2  - Scientific Reports
T1  - Effects of online parietal transcranial electric stimulation on associative memory: a direct comparison between tDCS, theta tACS, and theta-oscillatory tDCS
IS  - 1
SP  - 14091
VL  - 12
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-022-18376-5
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Živanović, Marko and Bjekić, Jovana and Konstantinović, Uroš and Filipović, Saša",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Associative memory (AM) is the ability to remember and retrieve multiple items bound together. Previous studies aiming to modulate AM by various transcranial electric stimulation (tES) techniques were inconclusive, although overall suggestive that tES could be a tool for AM enhancement. However, evidence from a direct comparison between different tES techniques is lacking. Here, in a sham-controlled cross-over experiment, we comparatively assessed the effects of three types of tES—anodal tDCS, theta-band transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and theta-oscillatory tDCS (otDCS), delivered over the left posterior parietal cortex, during a short-term digit-color AM task with cued-recall. The effects were tested in 40 healthy young participants while both oscillatory tES were delivered at a previously determined individual theta frequency (4–8 Hz). All three active stimulations facilitated the overall AM performance, and no differences could be detected between them on direct comparison. However, unlike tDCS, the effects of which appeared to stem mainly from the facilitation of low-memory demand trials, both theta-modulated tACS and otDCS primarily promoted AM in high memory demand trials. Comparable yet differential effects of tDCS, theta tACS, and otDCS could be attributed to differences in their presumed modes of action.",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
title = "Effects of online parietal transcranial electric stimulation on associative memory: a direct comparison between tDCS, theta tACS, and theta-oscillatory tDCS",
number = "1",
pages = "14091",
volume = "12",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-022-18376-5"
}
Živanović, M., Bjekić, J., Konstantinović, U.,& Filipović, S.. (2022). Effects of online parietal transcranial electric stimulation on associative memory: a direct comparison between tDCS, theta tACS, and theta-oscillatory tDCS. in Scientific Reports
Springer Nature., 12(1), 14091.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18376-5
Živanović M, Bjekić J, Konstantinović U, Filipović S. Effects of online parietal transcranial electric stimulation on associative memory: a direct comparison between tDCS, theta tACS, and theta-oscillatory tDCS. in Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):14091.
doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18376-5 .
Živanović, Marko, Bjekić, Jovana, Konstantinović, Uroš, Filipović, Saša, "Effects of online parietal transcranial electric stimulation on associative memory: a direct comparison between tDCS, theta tACS, and theta-oscillatory tDCS" in Scientific Reports, 12, no. 1 (2022):14091,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18376-5 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIMI | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIMI | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB