Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorJanićijević, Danica
dc.creatorKnežević, Olivera
dc.creatorMirkov, Dragan M.
dc.creatorPerez-Castilla, Alejandro
dc.creatorPetrović, Miloš R.
dc.creatorSamozino, Pierre
dc.creatorGarcia-Ramos, Amador
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T13:07:50Z
dc.date.available2021-04-20T13:07:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1746-1391
dc.identifier.urihttp://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1020
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the reliability and magnitude of the force-velocity (F-V) relationship parameters between the squat jumps performed from the 90 degrees (SJ90) and self-preferred knee angle (SJ(pref)). A secondary aim was to explore the effect of the analysis procedure (force platform [FP] and Samozino's [SAM] method) and the number of loads tested (three- and two-point methods) on the F-V relationships. Twelve men were tested in two sessions during the SJ90 and SJ(pref). Two identical blocks of jumps were performed in each session against three external loads. The F-V relationship parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, F-V slope and maximum power) were determined at each block through the FP and SAM procedures using the data collected under three (three-point method) or only the two most distant loads (two-point method). The average coefficient of variation (CV) of the four F-V parameters revealed a higher reliability for the SJ90 compared to the SJ(pref) (5.86% vs. 7.55%; CVratio = 1.29) with more pronounced differences using the FP (CVratio = 1.43) than the SAM procedure (CVratio = 1.14), and higher reliability for the SAM compared to the FP (6.14% vs. 7.27%; CVratio = 1.18). The SJ(pref) and SAM procedures provided comparable or higher magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters than the SJ90 and FP, respectively. The three- and two-point methods revealed a comparable reliability and trivial differences in the magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters. The routine testing procedure of the F-V relationship could be simplified using the SJ(pref), the SAM procedure and the two-point method.en
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon
dc.relationUniversity of Granada under a post-doctoral grant (perfeccionamiento de doctores)
dc.relationFPU15/03649
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/175037/RS//
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/175012/RS//
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceEuropean Journal of Sport Science
dc.subjectForce platformen
dc.subjectSamozino's methoden
dc.subjectmultiple-point methoden
dc.subjecttwo-point methoden
dc.titleAssessment of the force-velocity relationship during vertical jumps: influence of the starting position, analysis procedures and number of loadsen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage623
dc.citation.issue5
dc.citation.other20(5): 614-623
dc.citation.rankM21~
dc.citation.spage614
dc.citation.volume20
dc.description.otherPeer-reviewed manuscript: [http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1128]
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17461391.2019.1645886
dc.identifier.pmid31314671
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070293986
dc.identifier.wos000480202200001
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу