Приказ основних података о документу
Assessment of the force-velocity relationship during vertical jumps: influence of the starting position, analysis procedures and number of loads
dc.creator | Janićijević, Danica | |
dc.creator | Knežević, Olivera | |
dc.creator | Mirkov, Dragan M. | |
dc.creator | Perez-Castilla, Alejandro | |
dc.creator | Petrović, Miloš R. | |
dc.creator | Samozino, Pierre | |
dc.creator | Garcia-Ramos, Amador | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-24T13:22:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1746-1391 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1128 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to compare the reliability and magnitude of the force-velocity (F-V) relationship parameters between the squat jumps performed from the 90 degrees (SJ90) and self-preferred knee angle (SJ(pref)). A secondary aim was to explore the effect of the analysis procedure (force platform [FP] and Samozino's [SAM] method) and the number of loads tested (three- and two-point methods) on the F-V relationships. Twelve men were tested in two sessions during the SJ90 and SJ(pref). Two identical blocks of jumps were performed in each session against three external loads. The F-V relationship parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, F-V slope and maximum power) were determined at each block through the FP and SAM procedures using the data collected under three (three-point method) or only the two most distant loads (two-point method). The average coefficient of variation (CV) of the four F-V parameters revealed a higher reliability for the SJ90 compared to the SJ(pref) (5.86% vs. 7.55%; CVratio = 1.29) with more pronounced differences using the FP (CVratio = 1.43) than the SAM procedure (CVratio = 1.14), and higher reliability for the SAM compared to the FP (6.14% vs. 7.27%; CVratio = 1.18). The SJ(pref) and SAM procedures provided comparable or higher magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters than the SJ90 and FP, respectively. The three- and two-point methods revealed a comparable reliability and trivial differences in the magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters. The routine testing procedure of the F-V relationship could be simplified using the SJ(pref), the SAM procedure and the two-point method. | en |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon | |
dc.relation | University of Granada under a post-doctoral grant (perfeccionamiento de doctores) | |
dc.relation | FPU15/03649 | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/175037/RS// | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/175012/RS// | |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1020 | |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1645886 | |
dc.rights | embargoedAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
dc.source | European Journal of Sport Science | |
dc.subject | Force platform | en |
dc.subject | Samozino's method | en |
dc.subject | multiple-point method | en |
dc.subject | two-point method | en |
dc.title | Assessment of the force-velocity relationship during vertical jumps: influence of the starting position, analysis procedures and number of loads | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | BY-NC | |
dc.citation.epage | 623 | |
dc.citation.issue | 5 | |
dc.citation.other | 20(5): 614-623 | |
dc.citation.rank | M21~ | |
dc.citation.spage | 614 | |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | |
dc.description.other | This is the peer-reviewed version of the article: Janićijević, D.; Knežević, O.; Mirkov, D. M.; Perez-Castilla, A.; Petrović, M. R.; Samozino, P.; Garcia-Ramos, A. Assessment of the Force-Velocity Relationship during Vertical Jumps: Influence of the Starting Position, Analysis Procedures and Number of Loads. European Journal of Sport Science 2020, 20 (5), 614–623. [https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1645886] | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17461391.2019.1645886 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://rimi.imi.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2403/Assessment_ofthe.pdf | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31314671 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85070293986 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 000480202200001 | |
dc.type.version | acceptedVersion |